Loading ...
Loading ...
Judging Q and saving Jesus: Q’s contribution to the wisdom-apocalypticism debate in historical Jesus studies

Publication Info

Added 2016-07-13

PDF

ISBN-13: 978-0-620-68737-9
Date of first publication: 2016
doi: 10.4102/aosis.jqsj.2015.01

HTML

ISBN-13: 978-0-620-68737-9
Date of first publication: 2016
doi: 10.4102/aosis.jqsj.2015.01

XML

Co-publisher's ISBN-13: 978-0-620-68737-9
Date of first publication: 2016
doi: 10.4102/aosis.jqsj.2015.01

Related categories

Judging Q and saving Jesus: Q’s contribution to the wisdom-apocalypticism debate in historical Jesus studies

Llewellyn Howes

This book is open access under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 licence. The monograph Judging Q and saving Jesus is characterised by careful textual analysis, showing a piercing critical eye in its impressive engagement with the secondary literature, and sharp and insightful critique. The target audience are specialists in the field of research on the Sayings Source Q (the hypothetical source of certain sayings of Jesus common to Matthew and Luke), historical Jesus, and early Christian theology. The book takes the stance that the hypothetical document Q can be reconstructed with sufficient precision and that this enables biblical scholars to study with confidence its genre and its thematic and ideological profile. The genre issue is central to the book overall structure and the alternative proposals are discussed at length and with sophistication. The author’s inference is that Q’s macrogenre is sapiential with occasional insertions of apocalyptic microstructures and motifs. This finding embodies progress in Historical Jesus studies. An opposing trend has been to label Jesus an apocalypticist, so that the great ‘either-or’ of contemporary Jesus scholarship has been ‘either eschatological or not’, an alternative that dates back to Albert Schweitzer.

The author finds that generally, and even when used apocalyptically, the term Son of Man tends to support arguments best understood as sapiential in outlook. This is consistent with the sapiential genre of the document as a whole. This finding is supported by the close and careful exegesis of Q 6:37−38 (on not judging). He reconstructs the original wording of this saying ‘on not judging’ and explores the idea of ‘weighing’ in judgment (psychostasia), determining in the end that the saying is entirely sapiential.

Chief Editor, A.G. van Aarde

 

The ePUB can be bought at Amazon (click here).

About the Author: Llewellyn Howes

No biography available at this time.

Please note: In order to purchase items, you will need to log in first. Selecting an item to purchase will direct you to the login page. Any item marked with an Open Access icon may be downloaded free of charge, without logging in.

PDF
 

Our books are mostly published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. Please consult each books synopsis for more information.

Connect on: FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedIn and YouTube. Subscribe to our newsletter.

 

Ⓒ2017 AOSIS (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved. No unauthorised duplication allowed.

AOSIS Publishing | Empowering Africa through access to knowledge
Postnet Suite #110, Private Bag X19, Durbanville, South Africa, 7551
RSA Tel: 086 1000 381, Inst. Tel: +27 21 975 2602, Fax: 086 5004 974, publishing(AT)aosis.co.za replace (AT) with @

Please read the privacy statement.